A short post to share something that amused me. I mentioned in my last post that I spent some time helping my sister organize and pack for her move to her new house. It provided us quality “sister time” and of course, at times my DD lifestyle was the topic of conversation (Post 116. Revealing DD to my sisters).
I’ve fielded questions from her before (Post 121. 20 Questions…) so her inquiry is nothing new. She asked many of the same questions she always asks – as I mentioned before, I found that learning about someone’s motivations and actions in D/s is a lot like learning a new language. You need repetition for it to fully sink in.
As she is prone to read my blog I shared the events and punishment regarding my last few posts. She asked me if there is anything I wouldn’t do for Mike. Of course, she meant physically or sexually. I told her that scat (poop), blood, and branding were understood to be hard limits. Other than that, I would rely on safe words as a way to moderate a situation.
She then asked if that means I would have sex with anyone Mike told me to have sex with. I told her that I would definitely give it strong consideration, and unless I felt unsafe, I would do so. She then jokingly said, “So if he told you to seduce Shaun (her husband), you would do so?” My initial response was, “Yes, if SHE approved of it as I would never do such a thing in secret.” She then said, “So if Mike said he wanted to have sex with me, you would allow it?” Again I said, “If Shaun approved of it, then yes.” Of course I said jokingly “Are you proposing this?”
“No way! Never!” was her reply. She said she just wanted to know my answer. “Good,” I said, “because frankly the idea of that has greater ick factor than drinking pee.” It would just be too weird. Of course she then said, “So why would you be willing to do it?”
I had to clarify my response. “I didn’t know you wanted a more serious and thoughtful answer.” I told her that my acquiescing to anything Mike asks for doesn’t necessarily mean I have a desire to do that particular act. My greatest desire and fulfillment is in the acquiescing and not in the act.
In this hypothetical situation, I would have to be convinced that there would be no negative ramifications on our (my sis and I) relationship. If I were to seriously give this thought, I think it would be very difficult to convince me it has any upside – the risk of negatively altering our “sisterhood” was too great. Therefore, I doubt I would support it. However, just like anything Mike requests, I would give it the appropriate consideration it was due.
She then nodded, “Okay, I get it.” To which after a pause for dramatic effect I dryly replied, “So that means Mike doesn’t get to fuck you?” She laughed and said, “No, he doesn’t. . .and Shawn doesn’t get to fuck you either.”
As I share all with Mike, and was also curious about his reaction, I told him of this conversation with my sister. Mike said, “It would be safer and saner to juggle flaming machetes while standing in gasoline.” He wanted to know what on earth made me ask such a thing. “Hey, just wanting to understand some boundaries.”
Mike then added, “By the way, did I hear your say ‘Fuck.’
Uh-oh, I’m in trouble.
2 thoughts on “165. Boundaries: Juggling flaming machetes”